Which AI models watermark their text
2 of these 5 assistants mark the text they generate, and ChatGPT does so in part. None of the marks is made of characters a scanner can find. This page records what each provider actually does, what the evidence is, and when it was last checked.
| Model | Text watermark | Mechanism | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| ClaudeAnthropic | Marked | SynthID-Text, keyed token selection | |
| GeminiGoogle | Marked | SynthID-Text, tournament sampling | |
| ChatGPTOpenAI | Marked in part | textGrain, keyed word choice; EU and API opt-in | |
| CopilotMicrosoft | Not marked | C2PA on images, nothing for text | |
| GrokSpaceXAI | Not marked | Visible mark on media only |
What each provider does
Claude
MarkedAnthropic · verifiedMarked on models launched from August 2026, by a keyed bias in word choice rather than hidden characters.
Sources: Anthropic · Anthropic Help Center · TechCrunch
Read the Claude entry →Gemini
MarkedGoogle · verifiedMarked in the Gemini app and web experience since 2024, by the most thoroughly published scheme of the five.
Sources: Nature 634(8035), 818–823 · Google DeepMind · Google AI for Developers · Google
Read the Gemini entry →ChatGPT
Marked in partOpenAI · verifiedtextGrain announced October 2026: opt-in in the API, rolling out to ChatGPT and Codex in the EU, no global default.
Sources: OpenAI · OpenAI, technical report · Rumi · OpenAI Developer Community · European Commission · European Commission
Read the ChatGPT entry →Copilot
Not markedMicrosoft · verifiedNo text watermark documented. Images always carry provenance metadata; audio and video marking is optional.
Sources: Microsoft Learn · Microsoft Learn · Microsoft Learn · C2PA
Read the Copilot entry →Grok
Not markedSpaceXAI · verifiedNothing documented for text. Images and video carry a visible label, and the maker did not sign the EU code.
Sources: SpaceXAI · SpaceXAI · European Commission · European Commission · City AM
Read the Grok entry →Invisible characters are a different thing
The eight characters below are real, and they do turn up in text that has passed through a model, an editor, a PDF or a web page. They are not watermarks. Nobody places them to identify anything, removing them defeats no provenance system, and finding one points to a text-handling step rather than to an author.
These eight are what our tools detect and clean, and nothing more. The real text watermarks on this page work by biasing which word a model picks, which no scanner can read from text alone — so we cannot detect them, and neither can anyone else. What a rewrite does is replace those word choices, which is the only edit that reaches a mark made of them. Each vendor says as much in the pages cited above. What nobody outside a keyholder can tell you is what their detector would then conclude.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a watermark and an invisible character?
A watermark is a statistical signal placed while the model chooses its words; nothing is inserted, and reading it needs a key. An invisible character is a real code point that ended up in the text, usually by accident. Only the second can be found by scanning.
Can any tool tell me which model wrote a passage?
No public tool can, including ours. The providers that do watermark text keep detection behind a key, and the characters that scanners find are produced by editors and web pages as readily as by models.
Why do these pages carry a verification date?
Because the answers change. Anthropic began marking text in August 2026, and OpenAI announced a text watermark of its own on 5 October 2026, which turned one entry here from unmarked to marked. Each records when it was last checked against primary sources.
Related tools
Related reading
How these records are checked, and what this site refuses to claim, is set out elsewhere. About GenPolish.
Working on your own draft?
GenPolish rewrites text you already have, showing every change before you accept it. A watermark lives in the word choices, so replacing the words is what reaches it. We show what share of your words changed, and make no claim about detectors.